IMPROVED ECONOMIC PRODUCTIVITY

The Strategic Plan for Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems in the United States (Intelligent Vehicle Highway Society of America, 1992) cites improving productivity of individuals, organizations, and the economy as a whole as a basic objective of IVHS. From the institutional perspective, this objective can be achieved by reducing total institutional expenditures for the transportation infrastructure. From the individual and CVO perspective, improved economic productivity relates to specific gains by individuals and commercial operators. A closely related objective is improved energy consumption, which translates into cost savings for all components of the economy. Mean ratings and 95% CI for the importance of ATIS subsystems in meeting the objective of improved economic productivity in private and commercial applications is depicted in figure 7. Mean ratings for IRANS are near maximum for both private and commercial applications and, in both cases, review of 95% CI (see appendix A, table 41, for detailed values) indicates that IRANS was rated significantly higher than all other subsystems. This finding represents the common view that improved route selection and navigation will be the central capability supporting improved economic productivity. In the case of private applications, IMSIS was rated significantly higher than the remaining two subsystems, reflecting the view that increased access to commercial listings would serve as an economic stimulus to drivers of private vehicles. In contrast, IMSIS, ISIS, and IVSAWS ratings were not significantly different from one another for commercial applications.

Figure 7. Mean importance ratings for ATIS subsystems in meeting the objective of improved economic productivity for private and commercial vehicle applications.

Table 6 provides an overview of the performance objectives and measures associated with the general ATIS objective of improved economic productivity that were identified through the review of operational test plans, strategic plans, and interview notes. No performance requirements were identified within the transportation community. Three performance measures and seven performance objectives were identified, as described below.

Table 6. Improved economic productivity objectives, measures, and performance requirements.

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES, MEASURES, AND REQUIREMENTS

SOURCE

TYPE

Institutional Performance Objectives, Measures, and Requirements

Reduced new road construction costs

DOT, GOV-Both

Objective

Improved efficiency of roadway operations and maintenance

GOV-Both

Objective

Improved efficiency in public service vehicle operations

GOV-Both

Objective

Improved efficiency of transportation planning

DOT, GOV-Both, IVHS America

Objective

Private Vehicle Performance Objectives, Measures, and Requirements

Reduced private vehicle operating costs

FAST-TRAC, Mobility 2000

Measure

CVO Performance Objectives, Measures, and Requirements

Reduced vehicle operation costs

R&D-Both, Mobility 2000

Objective

Increased vehicle service coverage

R&D-Both

Measure

Increased efficiency of dispatch operations

R&D-Both

Measure

Improved timeliness of delivery

Gov-Both, R&D-Both, Mobility 2000

Objective

Reduced vehicle maintenance costs

R&D-Both

Objective

 

Institutional Performance Objectives, Measures, and Requirements

Institutional goals addressing improved economic productivity were limited to four performance objectives. These objectives address reductions in new road construction costs, efficiencies in public service vehicle operations, efficiencies in roadway operations and maintenance, and improvements in transportation planning.

Private Vehicle Driver Performance Objectives, Measures, and Requirements

CVO Performance Objectives, Measures, and Requirements

CVO performance objectives and measures associated with economic productivity include various aspects of operational efficiency and effectiveness, as summarized below.