BTS Navigation Bar

NTL Menu


Indianapolis Travel Simulation Model Study - Summary of Year 2005 Travel Demand Forecast - Technical Memorandum 8





Click HERE for graphic.





                          TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

I         SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS OF PREVIOUS TECHNICAL 
          MEMORANDA

II        YEAR 2005 NETWORK

III       YEAR 2005 SOCIOECONOMIC FORECASTS

IV        YEAR 2005 TRIP GENERATION

V         YEAR 2005 DISTRIBUTION

VI        YEAR 2005 MODAL SPLIT AND AUTOMOBILE OCCUPANCY

VII       YEAR 2005 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

VIII      YEAR 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

IX        RECOMMENDED THOROUGHFARE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS

APPENDICES

I-1       YEAR 2005 EXTERNAL TRIPS

III-1     SUMMARY OF POPULATION GROWTH BY SECTOR

III-2     SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD GROWTH BY SECTOR

III-3     SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT GROWTH BY SECTOR

III-4     SUMMARY OF RETAIL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH BY SECTOR

IV-1      YEAR 2005 TRIP GENERATION TABLE

V-1       YEAR 2005 TRIP DISTRIBUTION TABLE

VIII-1    1980 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

IX-1      THOROUGHFARE PLAN PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY





       I. SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS OF PREVIOUS TECHNICAL MEMORANDA


INTRODUCTION

The travel demand simulation models used for transportation
planning in Indianapolis were initially developed in the mid-
1960's.  In 1976, these models were re-calibrated and simplified
and a new modal split procedure was added.  Since that time,
significant changes have occurred in computer technology in both
hardware and software and in the types of travel demand information
needed by the users of this modeling process.  In 1983, the
Division of Planning discovered the problems of underestimating
traffic volumes in the existing travel demand modeling procedure
and decided to update the procedure to incorporate new technologies
and procedures.  This study, with the consulting assistance of the
COMSIS Corporation, represents this effort.

Technical Memorandum 8, the final memorandum of this study, serves
to document the final application of this new micro-computer MinUTP
procedure in forecasting and assigning year 2005 traffic to the
year 2005 network (the recommended Thoroughfare Plan street
system).

SOURCES OF UNDERASSIGNMENTS

After a careful review of the Indianapolis travel demand
forecasting process, four problem areas were identified as
potential causes of the underassignment of trips. They included:

-         trip generation - derivation of trip generation equations
          from survey results not fully expanded to ground counts

-         auto occupancy rates - incorrect computation of internal
          auto occupancy rates by trip purpose

-         external trip estimation - severe underestimation of
          external trips due to low growth rates and completion of
          Interstate segments.

-         traffic counts - the use of tube counts unadjusted for
          multiple axle vehicles

The recommendations for correcting these problem areas, as well as
simplifying and improving the predictive ability of the models are
presented below and have been employed in the following Year 2005
travel demand forecasting process.


                                 I-1





REVIEW OF TRAVEL:DEMAND FORECASTING PROCESS (Technical Memorandum
1)

Data inputs and component steps of the simulation model were
reviewed.  Detailed recommendations were made for calibrating the
new computer model based on the MinUTP microcomputer program.

1980 CENSUS URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PACKAGE (Technical
Memorandum 2)

The 1980 Census Urban Transportation Planning Package (UTPP) is a
special computer tape which contains the most recent available
information on the journey-to-work trips by transportation analysis
zones.  Only portions of relevant data were processed for this
study.  This memorandum documents the data processing and editing
of this information source and summarizes the socioeconomic and
travel data for the subsequent trip generation analysis.

TRIP GENERATION (Technical Memorandum 3)

The use of cross-classification analysis instead of multiple
regression analysis for the trip production model was recommended. 
Stratification by household size and income were used.

It was also recommended that the basic multiple regression
equations for the trip attraction model be re-calibrated.  A
special truck equation was also developed.

TRIP DISTRIBUTION (Technical Memorandum 4)

The trip distribution model is used to link up the trip ends
estimated in the trip generation step of the urban travel demand
forecasting processed The output of the trip distribution model is
a trip table, which is a matrix containing the magnitude of trip
movements among all of the transportation zones in the region. 
Trip length frequency distribution for five (5) trip purposes were
calibrated to match previous historical data and models.

MODE CHOICE AND AUTO OCCUPANCY (Technical Memorandum 5)

The modal split models were essentially unchanged from those
developed in 1976.  They are system-sensitive, post-distribution
models based on disutility functions in a series of logit curves.

It was recommended that auto occupancy rates for the internal auto
trips be re-computed based on information from the 1980 Census UTPP
And the 1964 IRTADS data.  Auto occupancy rates and the percentages
of transit use were both developed for the home-based work, home-
based shop, home-based other, and non-home based trip purpose
stratifications.


                                 I-2





EXTERNAL TRIPS (Technical Memorandum 6)

Based on an external cordon count conducted during 1980-81, there
has been a severe underestimation of external trips forecast for
the Indianapolis region.  As seen in the table below, the 1980/81
cordon count is 38% greater than the 1975 estimate and 43% greater
than the year 2000 update forecast.  It is hypothesized that the
use of 1964 IRTADS external surveys as a base, subsequent
completion of Interstate segments, and low growth factors
contributed to this disparity of external cordon trips.

SOURCE                             CORDON COUNT

1964 IRTADS Trips                  197,000
1975/76 Estimate                   387,000
Year 2000 Update Forecast          373,511
1980/81 Count                      534,218

It was recommended that the 1980/81 external cordon count serve as
the base year trip table for external trip estimation.  The
distribution of these 1980/81 external cordon trips will be derived
from IRTADS data, available data from similar metropolitan areas
and professional judgement.

The Year 2005 external trips crossing the IRTADS cordon line were
estimated to be 910,00 ADT.  This estimate was based on an
extrapolation of current traffic count trends in direct proportion
to the rise in total personal earnings.  Appendix I-1 provides a
more detailed discussion of historic data and future forecasts
relating to external trips.

TRAFFIC COUNTS (Technical Memorandum 6)

Traffic counts were used to calibrate the 1980 traffic simulation
model and to determine its accuracy.  Because the traffic counts
provide the basis for calibrating the traffic simulation model and
developing VMT estimates an evaluation of the precision of the
traffic counts was performed.

These counts have been adjusted by acceptable procedures to
represent a typical month and passenger equivalent vehicles.

TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (Technical Memorandum 6)

Traffic assignment is the final step in the four-step urban
transportation planning process.  It involves the allocation of the
vehicle trip table to the highway network.  Assignment was
performed with four iterations of capacity restraint.  The link
impedances were updated, using the FHWA equation based upon the V/C
ratio, after all trips were assigned in each iteration.  The
resulting link volumes are the average of all iterations.


                                 I-3





SOCIOECONOMIC FORECASTS ( Technical Memorandum 7)

Socioeconomic forecasts were prepared in three parts.  Part A
describes the forecasts for the entire study area encompasses all
of Marion County and portions of Hamilton and Johnson Counties. 
Part B describes the allocation of areawide forecasts to sectors
and Part C describes the final allocation of forecasts to various
districts and zones within each sector.  Parts A, B and C were
combined into one single document.  The final zonal data were then
used as inputs to the Year 2005 travel demand simulation process.

                                 I-4





                        II. YEAR 2005 NETWORK


A computer representation of the Official Thoroughfare Plan as
amended in November, 1983 was coded for the Year 2005 network.  The
network contains 2,794 miles of street segments as represented by
the non-directional network links.  This network includes the
following groups of major facility types:


-    Freeways, Expressways, and Ramps         370 Miles
-    Arterial Streets                       1,889 Miles
-    Local Streets (Centroid Connectors)      535 Miles

          TOTAL                             2,794 Miles


Area types of the Year 2005 network are:
-    Central Business District (CBD)          102 Miles
-    Fringe                                   872 Miles
-    Residential                            1,260 Miles
-    Suburban CBD                              43 Miles
-    Rural                                    517 Miles

     TOTAL                                  2,794 Miles


Exhibit II-1 shows the arterial streets, freeways, and expressways
(facility types) and Exhibit II-2 shows the geographic locations
(area types) included in the Year 2005 network.





Click HERE for graphic.


                                II-2





Click HERE for graphic.


                                II-3





               III.  YEAR 2005 SOCIOECONOMIC FORECASTS


Year 2005 socioeconomic factors are detailed in Technical
Memorandum 7. Five (5) demographic data were forecasted for the
region, and each sector, district and traffic analysis zone:


-    Population
-    Households
-    Median Household Income
-    Retail Employment
-    Total Employment


Forecasts for automobile ownership were also performed in
conjunction with the median household income forecasts.  Three
additional forecast variables were then derived from these
forecasted data:


-     Population/Household
-     Automobile/Household
-     Non-Retail Employment


Exhibit III-1 summarizes the forecasted socioeconomic growth
between 1980 and year 2005.  Marion County contains 90.0% of the
total population, 90.8% of the households and 94.5% of the total
employment in the region in 1980.  In year 2005, Marion County is
forecasted to share 90.0% of the total population, 90.8% of the
households and 94.5% of the total employment in the region.


Also included in the Appendix are summaries of the 1980-2005 growth
in population, households, total employment, and retail employment
by sectors.  The final zonal socioeconomic data were then used for
inputs into the trip generation models.





                            EXHIBIT III-1

                   SUMMARY OF SOCIOECONOMIC GROWTH

                             1980 - 2005

              Indianapolis Transportation Planning Area


                    1980           2005           Change    %Change

Population          824,523        907,300         82,777   10.0%
Household           309,386        361,500         52,114   16.8%
Employment          427,974        567,500        139,526   32.6%
Retail Employ.       70,755        104,400         33,645   47.6%
Non-retail Employ.  357,219        463,100        105,881   29.6%


Pop. /Household        2.67            2.51         -0.16   -6.0%


                                III-2





                    IV. YEAR 2005 TRIP GENERATION


The socioeconomic forecasts were stratified into the following
classifications for the application of the trip generation models .
Exhibit IV-1 and IV-2 show the production and the attraction models
used in developing the year 2005 internal person trips.  Exhibit
IV-3 shows the year 2005 internal person trips by purpose. 
Detailed zonal productions and attractions are provided in Appendix
IV-1.


             Average Household Size (persons/household)

                         Low Class:     < 2.2
                      Medium Class:     2.2 - 3.0
                        High Class:     > 3.0

                  Median Household Income (annual)

                         Low Class:     < $9,600
                      Medium Class:     $9,600 - $21,800
                        High Class:     > $21,800


                            EXHIBIT IV-1

                     FINAL TRIP PRODUCTION MODEL
        Stratification of Household Size and Household Income

                                   Household Size
                              Low       Med.      High

                    Low       A         B
Household Income    Med.      D         E         F
                    High      G         H         I

                  Trip Production Rates by Purpose
               HBW       HBS       HBSC      HBO       NHB
     Cell A    0.83      0.39      0.27      0.77      0.57
     Cell B    1.16      0.55      0.39      1.06      0.80
     Cell C    1.34      0.70      0.50      1.37      0.90
     Cell D    1.62      0.70      0.50      1.37      0.96
     Cell E    1.79      0.90      0.65      1.77      1.28
     Cell F    2.15      1.04      0.74      2.05      1.56
     Cell G    1.89      0.86      0.62      1.68      1.34
     Cell H    2.21      1.04      0.74      2.05      1.78
     Cell I    2.34      1.18      0.85      2.32      2.26

     Note:          HBW = Home Based Work 
                    HBS = Home Based Shop 
                    HBSC= Home Based School 
                    HBO = Home Based Other 
                    NHB = Non-Home Based


                            EXHIBIT IV-2

                     FINAL TRIP ATTRACTION MODEL

     HBW = 0.80 (1.7 * Total Employment)
     HBS = 0.40 (10.0 * Retail Employment)
    HBSc = 1.31 (0.5 * Households)
     HBO = 1.67 (0.5 * Non-Retail Employment + 0.5 Households)

     NHB = 0.37 (2.0 * Retail Employ. + 2.5 * Non-Retail Employ. +
           0.5 * Households)


                            EXHIBIT IV-3

                   YEAR 2005 INTERNAL PERSON TRIPS
                                  
BY PURPOSE

Purpose             1980                2005

HBW                 582,159 (28.2%)     734,805 (28.3%)
HBS                 282,631 (13.7)      348,508 (13.4)
HBSc                202,961 (9.8)       249,385 (9.6)
HBO                 555,715 (26.9)      685,062 (26.4)
NHB                 439,951 (21.3)      578,213 (22.3)
               ____________________   ___________________

Total             2,063,417             2,595,973


                                IV-2





                   V. YEAR 2005 TRIP DISTRIBUTION


     The trip distribution model, which is loosely based on the law
of gravity, is used to link up the trip ends estimated in the trip
generation phase.  The output of this model is a person trip table
containing movements among 523 zones in the Indianapolis region. 
Two important measures of this process is included in this
Technical Memorandum: the average trip length by purpose, presented
in Exhibit V-1, and the trip length distribution tables included in
the Appendix.

                             EXHIBIT V-1

              AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH COMPARISON BY PURPOSE
                            (in minutes)


Purpose   1964*     1970*     1980 Est. year 2005
                                                                    
                            
HBW       20.24     19.04     17.95          18.19
HBS       11.64     11.88     11.62          12.29
HBSC      10.82     10.8      19.70           9.52
HBO       14.97     14.07     13.56          13.78
NHB       13.23     13.20     12.26          12.23
                                                 

Total     15.14     14.50     13.88          14.07


*Source:  UPP530/Work Paper 6, "Trip Distribution Analysis in
          Current Day Assignment", September, 1974, pages 14-17.


     The final results of the Indianapolis trip distribution model
were then used to apply modal split and auto occupancy rates.


                                 V-1





         VI. YEAR 2005 MODAL SPLIT AND AUTOMOBILE OCCUPANCY


     First, the percent transit usage were generated at the zonal
level by applying the modal split models.  The transit person trip
tables were then created by multiplying the total person trips by
these percentages.  The remaining person trips are auto person
trips.  Exhibit VI-1 shows the results of the modal split
application for the year 2005 transit trip tables.


     The remaining auto person trips must first be converted to
auto vehicle trip tables before they can be assigned to the
highway network. Average automobile occupancies were derived
from the 1980 Census UTPP for home-based work trips and from the
1964 IRTADS survey for all other trip purposes.  The following auto
occupancies by trip purpose were applied.


     Purpose        Auto
                    Occupancy


     HBW            1.14
     HBS            1.60
     HBSC           1.36
     Other          1.79


     The resulting internal vehicle trip tables are shown in
Exhibit VI-1 and the final vehicle trip tables include the
following are used for the year 2005 traffic assignment:


     Trip Tables    Vehicle Trips
                                 

-    internal        1,783,630
-    external          436,190
-    trucks            496,654

     Total           2,716,474


                                VI-1





                            EXHIBIT VI-1

                  YEAR 2005 INTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS

               Person         Transit        Vehicle

     HBW       734,805        22,896         642,303
     HBS       348,508         2,501         227,174
     HBSc      249,385         3,645         185,771
     Other   1,263,275         4,934         728,382
          ______________      _______        __________

             2,595,973        33,976        1,783,630


                                VI-2





                      VII.  TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT


     The daily traffic on the year 2005 thoroughfare system that
results from 2,716,474 daily vehicle trips is estimated to be
21,860,324 vehicle-miles of system use.  Approximately 35 percent
of the traffic would use freeways and expressways, with the
remaining 65 percent using arterial and local streets.  Exhibit
VII-1 shows the summary of traffic assignment in vehicle-hours and
vehicle-miles for the year 2005.


     If the Thoroughfare Plan is constructed as recommended, it is
expected that 70 percent of the street segments would operate
within capacity, i.e. Level of Service C or better; approximately
23 percent would operate in a modest over-capacity condition
wherein moderate traffic congestion would be experienced mostly
during the peak-hour commuting periods; and about 7 percent of the
total links would experience substantial congestion, wherein demand
would be at least 25 percent greater than the street capacity.  For
comparison, the corresponding percentages in 1980 are 76, 22, and 2
percent respectively.  Exhibit VII-2 shows the projected level of
service by facility type and by different areas of the Indianapolis
region in the year 2005 for the recommended plan.







                            EXHIBIT VII-1


              YEAR 2005 VEHICLE-MILES AND VEHICLE-HOURS
                              OF TRAVEL

               (Capacity Class: First digit = Area and
                      Second digit = Facility)

AVERAGE                       FREE-FLOW      CONGESTED
 CAP      LINK      VEHICLE   VEHICLE        VEHICLE        DELAY
CLASS     MILES     MILES     HOURS          HOURS          HOURS
___________________________________________________________________

11        13        313,666         6,711     7,006           295
13        26        194,843         9,742    15,151         5,409
14        22        394,254        17,574    20,537         2,990
15        26         65,580         6,558     7,038           480
16        66          1,334         2,763     3,659            69
17         9         61,611         2,444     2,806           368
21        25        480,202        10,142    11,255         1,113
22         4         57,053         1,902     1,980            78
23       355      2,190,403        87,155   134,931        47,776
24        34        450,974        16,537    18,454         1,917
25       308        532,195        53,220    57,855         4,635
26       140      2,047,070        75,386    81,803         6,417
27         6         39,946         1,585     2,126           541
31       170      4,445,777        98,563    127,085       28,522
32        48        756,017        21,522    33,873        12,351
33       641      3,168,913       112,680    162,913       50,233
34         5         87,217         2,907     3,136           229
35       162        520,559        52,056    55,888         3,832
36       214      2,703,698        90,123    101,851       11,828
37        21        133,662         5,296     6,188           892
41        11        508,249        11,268    12,579         1,491
43        15        103,573         3,824     5,336         1,512
45        11         18,601         1,860     1,962           102
46         6         63,202         2,107     2,131            24
51        53      1,031,686        19,392    24,328         4,936
52        13        218,693         5,055     7,261         2,206
53       349        965,408        34,399    56,950        22,551
55        26        264,853        26,485    26,959           474
56        71        306,533         9,555    10,091           536
57         2          6,063           240       260            20
_____     ____      ________       _______   _______        ______

TOTAL  2,792     22,191,835       789,024  1,003,672      214,648


Source:   PTHBLD 09-03-86 13:48 year 2005 assignment - revised
          REPORT - 4


                                VII-2





Click HERE for graphic.


                                VII-3





                    VIII.  ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS


     The environmental analysis includes both the fuel consumption
and the air pollution analyses.  These analyses were performed for
the 1980 traffic assignment based on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)
and speeds.  Appendix VIII-1 contains the technical specification
of these computations for the 1980 network.


YEAR 2005 FUEL CONSUMPTION

The year 2005 energy or fuel consumption analysis used the results
of the year 2005 traffic assignment in terms of link-by-link speeds
by freeway or arterial street functional classification.  The year
2005 vehicle gasoline consumption rates (by speed group and by
functional classification) were then assumed to be 83% of the 1980
rates based on projected improvements in the fuel efficiency of
newer vehicles.  The application of these year 2005 fuel
consumption rates to the year 2005 highway assignment resulted in
the following total fuel consumption for the entire network:

                     Fuel Consumption (gallons)

               1980                     2005

               271,620                  328,174 - Freeway
               525,650                  729,138 - Arterial

               797,270                1,057,312 - Total

This total fuel consumption for year 2005 is approximately 33%
increase over that for 1980.


YEAR 2005 AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS

     For the 1980 air pollution analysis, separate emission factors
for automobile and truck by speed group were used.  Three
automobile-related pollutants were included: carbon monoxide (CO),
hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrous oxides (NOx).  The application of
year 2005 pollutant emission factors obtained from "Characteristics
of Urban Transportation Systems" (CUTS) to the year 2005 highway
assignment resulted in the following pollutant emissions:

                               VIII-1





                   Pollutant Emissions (kilograms)

Type                Auto           Truck          Total

Carbon monoxide     324,172        22,901         347,073
Hydrocarbons         20,012         2,028          22,043
Nitrous oxides       35,018         4,376          39,394

Total               379,202        29,305         408,507

          1980 - 2005 Comparison

Type                1980           2005           % Change

Carbon monoxide     546,539        347,073   -36.5%
Hydrocarbons         60,272         22,043   -63.4%
Nitrous oxides       46,232         39,394   -14.8%

Total               653,043        408,507   -37.5%


This is approximately 38% reduction of the 1980,total pollutant
burden.  The reduction in these pollutants is primarily due to the
improved emission control of newer vehicles.

                               VIII-2





                            EXHIBIT IX-1

                    COMPARISON OF TWO ASSIGNMENTS

                           Year 2005 Trips
           on 1980 Base Year vs. 2005 Future Year Network


                    BASE YEAR      FUTURE YEAR
                     NETWORK        NETWORK       CHANGE    %

(1) Trips Assigned  2,700,198        2,716,476     +16,276   0.6

(2) VMT            22,196,409       21,992,772    -203,637  - 0.9

(3) VHT             1,011,547          904,547    -107,000  -10.6

(4) VHD                213,968         116,248    - 97,720  -45.7

(5) Average Trip
    Length (Mi)
    (2)/(l)              8.22           8.09         -0.13   -1.6

(6) Average Trip
    Time (Min)
    (3)/(l)             22.48            19.98       -2.50   -11.1

                                IX-2





Click HERE for graphic.


                                IX-3





Click HERE for graphic.


                                IX-4





Click HERE for graphic.


                                IX-5





     The information from Exhibits IX-3 and IX-4 were posted on a
work map showing the proposed roadway improvements to assess the
relationship between the proposed improvements and the resulting
traffic congestion.  Based on a review of these maps it can be
stated that the proposed improvements are effective in eliminating
severe congestion (V/C greater than 1.25) on the majority of the
future year network.  A large number of the road segments with a
V/C of 1 or greater are small fragmented segments, such as
intersection approaches.  Congestion on these links can be
addressed by transportation system management (TSM) type
improvements.

     As part of this review only the following improvements were
recommended to be added to the Year 2005 Network for future
testing:


     1.   Meridian Street from Smith Valley Road to Stones Crossing
          Road be upgraded from 2 to 4 lanes.


     2.   College Avenue from 96th Street to 116th Street be
          upgraded from 2 to 4 lanes.


     3.   82nd Street from Allisonville Road to I-69 be upgraded
          from 4 to 6 lanes.


     4.   Crawfordsville road from High School Road to Georgetown
          Road from 2 to 4 lanes.


An assignment run incorporating these recommendations resulted in
elimination of severe congestion on these four street segments. 
Likewise, three additional segments were recommended to be included
after further testing:


     5.   Shadeland Avenue from 82nd Street to Fall Creek Road from
          2 to 4 lanes.

     6.   Dandy Trail from U.S. 136 to 38th Street from 2 to 4
          lanes.

     7.   Keystone Avenue from 38th Street to Fall Creek Parkway
          from 4 to 6 lanes.


     Exhibit IX-5 shows the recommended implementation priority for
the Thoroughfare Plan improvements.  The detailed Thoroughfare Plan
street sections recommended for implementation by Year 2005 are
listed in Appendix IX-1.  These recommendations will be
incorporated in the Thoroughfare Plan report once the Metropolitan
Development Commission adopts the updated Thoroughfare Plan.

                                IX-6





Click HERE for graphic.


                                   IX-7






                              APPENDIX





                            APPENDIX 1-1


                             MEMORANDUM


To:  Ron Shimizu                             Date: June 17, 1986 
     COMSIS Corporation

From:J. P. Klausmeier                        Project: Indianapolis
Traffic Pflum, Klausmeier & Wagner                           
Simulation Model Consultants

Re:  External Trips


This Memo discusses historic data and future forecasts relating to
external trips passing through the stations along the cordon line
which encompasses the IRTADS area.  By definition, there are two
types of external trips:

1.   Through trips which have neither origin nor destination within
     the IRTADS area and which enter and leave through different
     stations.

2.   Terminating trips which have either origin or destination
     within the IRTADS area and the opposite trip end beyond.'
     These.trips may, or may not, enter and leave through the same
     external station.

In 1964, IRTADS conducted an external origin and destination (O &
D) survey, interviewing about 35% of inbound traffic.  That survey
determined that 8% of the inbound trips were through and 92% were
terminating.

There have been no origin-destination surveys conducted since 1964,
although traffic counts have been periodically conducted at, or
near, the various external stations.

A memorandum prepared by the City of Indianapolis, Department of
Metropolitan Development is attached.  The memo, dated 3/18/81,
analyzes the 1964 0 & D survey data and traffic counts conducted in
subsequent years.

Review of City Memo dated 3/18/81

The City Memo includes a listing of the external station numbers,
roadway names, 1964 0 & D data, 1975/76 traffic counts and 1980
traffic counts.  This data was reviewed relative to
Indiana Department of Highways traffic count maps with the
following observations:

1.   Station 400 represents both U.S. 31 and I-65 as the southern
     IRTADS border.  The traffic counts for 1975-76 and for 1980
     appear to be reasonable.  However, the 1964 count at this
     location according to IDOH was probably closer to 32,000 ADT
     rather than 42,000 as reported in the Memo. (1964 was prior to
     the opening of I-64.)

2.   Station 420 at the northwest corner of the IRTADS area
     represents 1-65 just north of its interchange with 1-465. 
     Here, the IDOH traffic count for 1980 was 32,000 ADT rather
     than 22,439 as reported in the City's Memo.





3.   Other count data appeared to be reasonable.

4.   The actual totals of the "count" columns of the Memo are as
     follows:

          1964        1975/1976         1980

          356,270     391,475           524,338

5.   The "count" totals reported in the text of the Memo are as
follows:
          1964        1975/1976         1980
          197,000     387,000           524,218

6.   Elsewhere in the Memo the following is shown:

                              1964      1975/76   1980

total external trips          184,112   358,333   485,387   
internal/external             171,225   329,666   446,557
through                        12,776    28,667    38,830

7.   It is concluded that, in item 5 above, the City Memo
     incorrectly Tabled the 197,000 as "count" rather than "trips"
     and that item 6 should be corrected as follows:

          356,270 ADT Count
          ___________________     =         329,880 trips

          1.08 adjusted for 
             through trips

                                        1964      1975/76   1980

internal-external trips                 303,490   329,666   446,557
through trips (8% of total trips)-       26,390    28,667    38,830
                                        _______   ________  _______
total external trips                    329,880    58,333   485,387
through trips*                           26,390    28,667    38,830
                                        _______   ________  _______
total external count                    356,270   387,000   524,217

*    through trips are "counted" twice as they enter and leave
     IRTADS area.

8.   Next, accounting for the data discrepancies noted in items I
     and 2 above, the table in item 7 should be further modified as
     follows:

                                   1964      1975/76   1980

internal-external trips            294,970   329,666   455,074
through trips (8% of total trips)   25,650    28,667    39,572
                                   _______   ________  _______
total external trips               320,620   358,333   494,646
through trips                       25,650    28,667    39,572
                                   _______   ________  _______
total external count               346,270*  387,000   534,218**

*    deduct 10,000 ADT from Station 400
**   add 10,000 ADT to Station 420

                                - 2 -





Forecast of External ADT Counts

External trips are a function of many complex demographic and
economic factors locally, regionally and nationally. Some of these
factors have been graphically displayed on the following chart.  An
exhaustive analysis of these factors is far beyond the scope of the
work of this project.  However, the trends depicted on the Figure,
indicate that external trips have been increasing at a faster rate
than any of the indicators examined.

If it is assumed, however, that the 1975/76 travel was reduced due
to high gasoline prices and low efficiency vehicles, then the trend
of external counts closely parallels the trend of total personal
income of the MSA.

Therefore,it was concluded to extrapolate the traffic count trend
to year 2005 in direct proportion to the rise in total personal
earnings yielding a total count of 910,000 ADT crossing the cordon
line of the IRTADS area.


Click HERE for graphic.


                                - 3 -




Allocation of External ADT Counts

The forecast of 910,000 vehicle crossings of the IRTADS cordon line
was allocated to the various external stations, first to Interstate
highways, then to State and U.S. Highways, and then to the
remaining roadways.  The allocations were made to stations in
consideration of the type of facility, number of lanes, and growth
in the corridor served by the station.  Table 1 summarizes the
historic and the forecast ADT at each external station.

Segregation of Through and Terminating Trips

The segregation of through and terminating trips was accomplished
by first examining the change of population and employment both
within and beyond the IRTADS area as shown by Table 2.


                               TABLE 2
                POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT STATISTICS

                         Within MSA                              
Inside IRTADS                      Outside IRTADS
          Population     Employment     Population     Employment 
1980      841,806        427,974        324,594        82,926
2005      907,300        567,500        351,800        85,150


               Population Within Indiana       
          State               IRTADS              Balance

1980      5,490,200           841,800             4,648,400
2005      5,934,300           907,300             5,027,000


               Population Within Indiana       
          State               IRTADS              Balance

1980      5,490,200           1,166,400           4,323,800
2005      5,934,300           1,259,100           4,675,200


Next, growth indices for terminating trips were computed as shown
in Table 3. The indices consider that the exchange of trips between
places within the IRTADS area and places beyond in direct
proportion to the product of the measures which produce or attract
trips, without regard to distance.


                                - 4 -





                               TABLE I

                       HISTORIC AND PROJECTED
                          EXTERNAL TRAFFIC

               Two-Direction ADT Count       One-Directional

                              Total             Year 2005
                              Year           ----------------
STATION   1964 1975-76   1980      2005      Through    Terminating

396**     8530  13850    19507     40000     4000      16000
397       2330   2330     2330      7000      326       3174
398       7350   7725     8047      1800     1800       7200
399       1490   1490     2585      7000      326       3174
400**    32420  36000    43268     90000    18000      27000
401       1390   2400     2500      7000      326       3174
402       1710   2000     2067      6000      279       2721
403       2120   2095     2567      5000      233       2267
404*     19710  22138    27523     60000    12000      18000
405**     7450   8285     8405     12000     1200       4800
406**   *32600  44193    74738     90000    18000      27000
407       3210   2195     2520      6000      279       2721
408**    11570   8552     8636     20000     2000       8000
409       1180   2422     4038     12000      559       5441
410*     21240  29000    43873     70000    14000      21000
411       6290  93336    24082     35000     1628      15872
412       2340   4356     4356     12000      559       5441
413**     3090   3000     1457      4000      400       1600
414        910    910      910      4000      186       1814
415**    20880  19400    26936     40000     4000      16000
416       1710   1710     1710      7000      326       3174
417       2140   8297    12388     25000     1164      11336
418**     9690  14232    19238     25000     2500      10000
419          0   4791     7252     12000      559       5441
420*     20560  29685    35013     60000    12000      18000
421       4050   4478     8213     12000      559       5441
422*     14710  13750    15719     28000     5600       8400
423**    10860  15207    17771     25000     2500      10000
424**    20250  23486    30022     35000     3500      14000
425***   52430  47304    55928     95000    19000      13500
426**    19230  18744    17457     35000     3500      14000
427       2830   1964     3162      6000      279       2721
     _____________________________________________________________

        346270 405325   534218    910000   131588     323412

     *    Denotes Interstate Highway
     **   Denotes State and/or US Highway


                                - 5 -





Table 3 indicates that the trip change indices based on population
growth within and beyond IRTADS are similar if either MSA or State
population figures are used.  These indices suggest the terminating
trips would increase by 16.5 to 16.8% just on the basis of
population.

Table I also indicates that when employment of IRTADS is used in
conjunction with population of the MSA beyond IRTADS, the index
increases by 43.7%. This suggests that because of the increase in
economic activity (measured by employment) within IRTADS,
terminating trips may increase by 43.7%

                               TABLE 3
                  TERMINATING TRIP GROWTH INCREASES


          Pop. of MSA              Pop. of MSA
Year      Inside IRTADS       Outside IRTADS

1980      841.8               X    324.6               =   273,248
2005      907.3               X    351.8               =   319,188
% Inc.                                                          16.8


          Pop. of MSA              Pop. of State
          Inside IRTADS       Outside MSA

1980      841.8               X    4,323.8             = 3,639,775
2005      907.3               X    4,675.2             = 4,241,809
% Inc.                                                          16.5


          Emp. of MSA              Pop. of MSA
          Inside IRTADS       Outside IRTADS

1980      428.0               X    324.6               =   138,929
2005      567.5               X    351.8               =   199,647
& Inc.                                                          43.7


It was concluded that terminating trips will increase both for
demographic and for economic reasons.  Therefore, terminating trips
were increased by 60.5% (43.7% + 16.8%).

The 1964 0 & D survey determined that 8% of the external trips were
through trips and 92% were terminating trips.  Since 1964, the
Interstate Highway System has been completed and inter-city
vehicular travel has increased.  Because of the network of
Interstate highways serving IRTADS and based on evidence in other
urban areas, it is estimated that through trips comprised about 14%
of external trips in 1980.


                                - 6 -





Table 4 segregates the 1980 cordon line traffic counts into 14%
through and 86% terminating trips.  The terminating trips were then
increased by 60.5% for 2005 with the balance of trips (17%) -
designated as through trips.


                               TABLE 4
                    TERMINATING AND THROUGH TRIPS


                         1964      1975/76        1980      2005

Internal-external trips  303,490   304,072        403,006   646,824
Through trips             26,390    41,464         65,606   131,588
Total external trips     329,880   345,536        468,612   778,412
                         _______   _______        ________  _______
Through trips             26,390    41,464         65,606   131,588
                         _______   _______        ________  _______
Total external count     346,270   387,000        534,218   910,000


Using the control totals established in Table 4, the values at
individual external stations were segregated with the results shown
on Table 1.

The UTPP data for 1980 includes the following information with
regard to place of residence of those who work and live in the
eight county Indianapolis MSA:

MSA Place           MSA Place           Total
of Residence        of Work             Workers

within IRTADS       beyond IRTADS        12,842
beyond IRTADS       within IRTADS        63,508
                                        _________
                                         76,350
within IRTADS       within IRTADS       364,466
                                        _________
                                        440,816

Thus, in 1980, there was a reported 76,350 workers who crossed the
IRTADS cordon line twice each day going to and coming from work,
accounting for 152,700 daily person-trips.  If an occupancy rate of
1.53 persons per vehicle is assumed for these long trips, then
100,000 daily vehicle trips across the cordon line would have been
made for work purposes.  This would have accounted for about 25% of
all external-internal trips in 1980.

If the 100,000 vehicle work trips are increased by 43.7% (the index
derived in Table 3) by the year 2005, then 143,700 vehicle work
trips could be expected, accounting for about 22% of all external-
internal trips.


                                - 7 -





                             MEMORANDUM

To   UPP 530 File

From Ronald Sobecki

Date March 18, 1981

Re   Cordon Count 1980/81


     An important aspect of the UPP S30 job regarding the review
     and validation of the travel demand models deals with the
     simulation of external/internal and through trips.  With the
     advent of the rush to the suburbs estimation of
     external/internal and through trips has become even more
     difficult.  The completion of the Interstate network has made
     it difficult to estimate through traffic.  These two phenomena
     were identified as a problem leading to under assignment in
     the 1973/1975 update process.

     Methodology

     Due the funding and timing constraints a full fledged cordon
     count/ survey to identify through and internal/external trips
     was not possible.  This would have required an origin-
     destination survey at established points along the cordon
     line.  In 1964 the Indiana State Highway Commission conducted
     an IRTADS External Survey.  More than 67 000 vehicle drivers
     were interviewed at 41 locations on major routes crossing the
     external cordon of the Study Area.  The 24-hour traffic volume
     on roads crossing the external cordon on which interview
     stations were operated was approximately 183,000 or 93 percent
     of the total 24-hour volume on all roads crossing the cordon.
     The 67,800 represent 34.6 percent of the 196,700 crossings of
     the cordon over a 24-hour period. The roadside interviews col-
     lected data on trip origins and destinations, vehicle type,
     trip purpose, and auto occupancy.  The interviews were viewed
     as a representative sample to expand the data collected.

     As mentioned earlier, the cost of doing a survey on the level
     of 1964 is prohibitive.  The 1980/81 cordon count used the
     same cordon area as 1964.  The area is the City of
     Indianapolis and all the communities in Marion County, plus
     two adjacent areas with strong ties to the central county; the
     area surrounding the City of Carmel in Hamilton County, and
     part of Johnson County including the City of Greenwood and the
     local communities of New Whiteland and Whiteland.  A letter
     was mailed to the Indiana State Highway Commission requesting
     counts on external stations under its jurisdiction (State


Department of Metropolitan Development
Division of Planning and Zoning
2041 City-County Building
Indianapolis, Indiana





     and U.S. Roads).  Letters were also mailed to the Hamilton
     County Highway Department and Johnson County Highway
     Department for counts on external stations under their
     jurisdiction.  The Indiana State Highway Commission responded
     with counts for all 22 U.S. and State Routes.  The Highway
     Departments of Hamilton and Johnson Counties failed to
     respond.

     The lack of response from Hamilton and Johnson Counties caused
     some problems.  There were 14 external stations that had no
     traffic counts.  Eight of these stations had traffic counts
     taken in 1964 and these counts were used again for 1980
     counts.  This still left 6 external stations for which no
     counts were available.  To estimate counts for these stations
     a simple procedure was followed.  The six stations all had the
     same functional classification (secondary arterials). All the
     station counts for secondary arterials were counted and the
     mean computed.  The mean for secondary arterials was used as
     an estimated count for the six external stations.  The next
     step was to total all the counts to reach a cordon count for
     the Indianapolis area.  Once this was finished the number of
     through trips and internal/external trips were computed.

Cordon Count Results

The cordon count for Indianapolis transportation planning area was
524,218.  This count is made up of internal-external trips,
external-internal trips, and external,external trips.  The
external-external trips are counted twice.  The 1964 IRTADS survey
found 8% of the trips are through trips.  To calculate these trips
a simple formula is used:

Cordon Count = Trips x (1 + Proportion of through trips) 
Cordon Count = Trips x (1 + 0.08)

The cordon count of 524,218 the total external trips would be
estimated as 524,218/1.08 or 485,387 trips; of these, 8 percent are
through trips or 38,830.  To visualize this graphically, refer to
the following diagram:


Click HERE for graphic.


Total Count

internal/ external  = 446,557
through (entry)     =  38,830
through (exit)      =  38,830
                    ____________
                      524,218


The 1980 Cordon count can be compared with the 1964 IRTADS count
and the 1975/76 estimate.


                                  2





          1964 IRTADS Count             = 197,000
          1980 IRTADS Forecast          = 334,470
          Year 2000 Update Forecast     = 373,511
          1975/1976 Estimate            = 387,000
          1980 Count                    = 524,218

     From these figures it is easy to see that the 1980 cordon
     count far exceeds the 1985 IRTADS forecast and the year 2000
     update forecast.  In fact the 1980 count is 135.5% greater
     than the 1975/76 estimate.  Another comparison can be made of
     internal/external and through trips.

                              1964      1975/76   1980
     total external trips     184,112   358,333   485,387
     internal/external        171,225   329,666   446,557
     through                   12,776    28,667    38,830

A map of the external traffic count stations and their respective
1980 counts follows along with a table showing the 1964, 1975/76
and 1980 traffic counts for external stations.


                                  3





Click HERE for graphic.


                                  4





CENTROID  SEGMENT             1964                1975-76   1980
                    _________________________
                    % Local   %Through  Count     Count     Count

396  S.R 37/Harding 92.1%     7.9%      8,530     13,850    19,507

397  Morgantown Road
                    98.3%     1.7%      2,330     N/A       2,330*

398  S.R. 135/Meridian
                    96.6%     3.4%      7,350     7,725     6,952

     Tracy Road     N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       1,095*

399  Whiteland Road W.
                    98.0%     2.0%      1,490     N/A       1,490*

     Avertt Road    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       1,095*

400  U.S. 31                                      13,900    13,908
                    80.2%     19.8%     42,420

     I-65 South                                   22,100    29,360

401  Whiteland Road E.
                    92.8%     7.2%      1,390     N/A       1,390*

     Worthville Road
                    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       1,095*

402  Greenwood Road 94.2%     5.8%      1,710     N/A       1,710*

     Shelbyville Road
                    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A         357

403  Acton Road     96.7%     3.3%      2,120     1,335     1,328

     Mitthoeffer Road
                    N/A       N/A       N/A         434       686

     Maze Road      N/A       N/A       N/A         326       553

404  McGregor Road  N/A       N/A       N/A         696       957

     I-74 Southeast 78.5%     21.5%     19,710    20,300    25,644

     Thompson Road  N/A       N/A       N/A       1,142        802

     Vandergriff Road
                    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A          120

405  U.S. 52 Southeast
                    96.05%    4.0%      7,450     7,370      7,129

     Prospect       N/A       N/A       N/A         905      1,276

406  U.S. 40/Washington                           15,100    16,731
                    81.5%     18.5%     32,600

     I-70 East                                    26,900    53,978

     10th Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A        1,133     2,164

     21st Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A        1,060     1,865

*Estimated Counts

                                  5





CENTROID  SEGMENT             1964                1975/76   1980
                    % Local   %Through   Count    Count     Count

407  38th Street E.                                 833     1,160
                    96.9%     3.1%      3,210

     46th Street E.                                  210     280

     30th Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A        1,152    1,080

408  U.S.36E.&SR 67N.
                    95.2%     4.8%      11,570     8,275    8,092
     56th St. E.    N/A       N/A       N/A          277      544

409  Fall Creek Rd. 97%       %2.5%     1,180        507     1,817
     62nd Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A        1,342     1,448
     65th Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A          145       217
     79th Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A          242       259
     86th Street E. N/A       N/A       N/A          186       297

410  Sargent Road   N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A          173
     Hague Road     N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A        2,451
     I-69 N.        81.4%     18.6%     21,240    29,000    41,249

411  Allisonville Rd
                    95.2%     4.8%       6,290      9,336   24,082

412  116th Street E.
                    97.0%     3.0%       2,340      4,356    4,356

413  River Road/SR 234
                    95.%      4.5%       3,090    N/A        1,457

414  Gray Road/146th St.
                    92.3%     7.7%        910     N/A         910*

415  U.S. 31/S.R. 431 N.
                    84.0%     16.0%     20,880    19,400    26,936

416  Mohawk/131st W.
                    93.6%      6.4%      1,710    N/A        1,710*

417  116th Street W.
                    93.0%      7.0%      2,140    N/A        2,140*
     106th Street W.
                    N/A       N/A        N/A      N/A        1,095*
     Ditch Road     N/A       N/A        N/A       7,431     7,696
     Township Line Rd
                    N/A       N/A        N/A        866      1,457
418  U.S. 421 North 93.4%     6.6%       9,690    14,232    19,238

419  Zionsville Road
                    N/A       N/A       N/A        4,027      5,398
     Moore Road     N/A       N/A       N/A          764        599
     Road 100       N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A         1,255

* Estimated Counts

                                  6





CENTROID    SEGMENT            1964               1975/76   1980
                    % Local   %Through  Count     Count     Count

420  1-65 N.        70.3%     29.7%     20,560    28,650    22,439
     86th Street    N/A       N/A       N/A        1,035     1,614
     Wilson Road    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A        1,090

421  56th Street W. 86.2%     12.8%      4,050     4,478     8,213

422  I-74  Northwest
                    76.0%     24.0%     14,710    13,750    15,719

423  U.S. 136 W.    89.%      10.5%     10,860    12,003    14,558

21st Street W.      N/A       N/A       N/A        3,204     3,213

424  10th Street W. N/A       N/A       N/A        7,198     7,219

     U.S. 36 W/Rockv.
                    95.1%     4.9%      20,250    14,048    21,450

     Morris Road    N/A       N/A       N/A        2,240     1,353

425  U.S. 40 W.                                   20,000    17,535
                    85.5%     14.5%     52,430
     I-70 W.                                      27,050    38,026
     Haueisen Road  N/A       N/A       N/A          254       367

426  S.R. 67 S.     94.4%     5.6%      19,230    17,900    16,035

     Camby Road     N/A       N/A       N/A          844     1,422

427  Mooresville Rd N/A       N/A       N/A          879       986

     Mendenhall Road
                    N/A       N/A       N/A          N/A     1,095*
     Mann Road      95.8%     4.2%       2,830     1,085     1,081


                          *Estimated Counts

                                  7






                           APPENDIX III-I
                    SUMMARY OF POPULATION GROWTH
                              BY SECTOR


Sector    1980      2005      Change         Change

     0      8217     14900      6683         81%
     1    191055    201658     10603          6%
     2    143629    139854     -3775         -3%
     3     90019    102208     12189         14%
     4     65975     71812      5837          9%
     5    129922    140871     10949          8%.
     6     35684     43245      7561         11%
     7     86276    102029     15753         18%
     8     73746     90723     16977         23%

TOTAL     824523    907300     82777         10%





          APPENDIX III-2
          SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD GROWTH
          BY SECTOR


Sector         1980      2005      Change         % Change

     0         4953       8080      3127          63%
     1         75284     85706     10422          14%
     2         50964     57218      6254          12%
     3         34609     37736      3127           9%
     4         22477     25604      3127          14%
     5         46835     57257     10422          22%
     6         12088     15215      3127          26%
     7         34189     40443      6254          18%
     8         27987     34241      6254          22%

TOTAL         309386    361500    52,114          17%





                    APPENDIX III-3
          SUMMARY OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
                         BY SECTOR


Sector         1980      2005      Change    % Change

     0         82853     125947    43094     52%
     1         82596     118640    36044     44%
     2         58358      64627     6269     11%
     3         43153      49607     6454     15%
     4         16640      19821     3181     19%
     5         31182      39481     8299     27%
     6         22851      30238     7387     32%
     7         56309      60915     4606      8%
     8         34032      58224    24192     71%

TOTAL         427974     567500    139526    33%





               APPENDIX III-4
     SUMMARY OF RETAIL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
                    BY SECTOR


Sector    1980      2005      Change    % Change

     0     8553     15775     7222      84%
     1    17494     27990    10496      60%
     2     6421      8540     2119      33%
     3    10173     13530     3357      33%
     4     2503      3320      817      33%
     5     8599     12730     4131      48%
     6     1713      1885      172      10%
     7     6495      7600     1105      17%
     8     8804     13030     4226      48%

TOTAL     70755    104400    33645      48%





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





                           APPENDIX VIII-1

          COMSIS
          PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIVISION

          11501 GEORGIA AVENUE
          WHEATON, MARYLAND 20902

          (301) 933-9211


          MEMORANDUM
          TO:       Sweson Yang
          FROM:     Ronald Shimizu
          SUBJECT:  1980 Indianapolis Travel Simulation Model
                    Environmental Analysis
          DATE:     July 31, 1986

     The 1980 environmental analysis for the Indianapolis Travel
     Simulation Model Study was performed utilizing the results of
     the 1980 highway assignment that were summarized in Technical
     Memorandum 6. The 1980 energy analysis consisted of the
     determination of fuel consumption based on vehicle miles of
     travel (VMT) and congested speeds.  The fuel consumption rates
     were obtained from "Characteristics of Urban .Transportation
     Systems" (CUTS) (1).  These fuel consumption rates were based
     on average speeds by freeway and arterial roadway
     classifications.  They reflect data for typical roadway
     segments for various curves, grades, stops per mile, and
     traffic densities.  A composite vehicle based on DOE estimates
     of 1981 on board performance was utilized consisting of 48.16%
     standard, 24.96% compact, 9.26% subcompact, 6.81% two ton
     trucks, 3.26% six-ton trucks, 3.29% twenty-ton trucks, and
     3.60% twenty-five ton trucks for freeways and 48.32% standard,
     25% compact, 10% subcompact, 10.41% two-ton trucks, 3.56% six-
     ton trucks, 1.44% twenty-ton trucks, and 1.27% twenty-five ton
     trucks for arterials. The actual vehicle gasoline consumption
     rates (gallons per vehicle mile of travel) are shown below:

     Average Speed (mph)
Class     60   55   50   45   40   35   30   25   20   15
______    ___  ___  ___  ___  ___  ___  ___  ___  ___  ___

Frwy      .053 .049 .047 .044 .043 .042 .042 --   --   --
Art.      --   --    --  .069 .068 .068 .068 .068 .066 .067

     The application of these fuel consumption rates (see MinUTP
     Users Manual for setup) to the 1980 Indianapolis highway
     assignment resulted in the following fuel consumption:

     Fuel Consumption (gallons)
          271,620   Freeway
          525,650   Arterial
          _____________________
          797,270   Total

     The 1980 air pollution analysis consisted of the determination
     of pollutant emissions based on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)
     and congested speeds.  The pollutant emission factors were
     obtained from the CUTS manual.  These pollutant emission
     factors were

Washington, DC Pittsburgh         1     Orlando   San Francisco





     based on average speeds by automobile and truck vehicle
     classifications.  They reflect cold starts, hot soaks, hot
     operation, and diurnal evaporation.  The assumed mix of autos
     by type is the same as in MOBIL1 (2).  The assumed truck
     vehicle mix is 30.2% light duty trucks (<6000 lbs,), 30.2%
     medium duty trucks (>6000 lbs.), 23.4% heavy duty trucks
     (gasoline), and 16.1% heavy duty trucks (diesel).  The actual
     pollutant emission factors (grams/mile) are shown below:

                    Auto                     Truck
          _____________________________ __________________________
          Carbon    Hydro-    Nitrous   Carbon    Hydro-    Nitrous
Speed     Monoxide  Carbon    Oxides    Monoxide  Carbon    Oxides

60.0      18.27     2.82      4.11       61.76    5.25      13.39
55.0      22.42     3.06      3.62       59.75    5.40      11.35
50.0      23.79     3.15      3.37       58.17    5.51      10.07
45.0      24.58     3.22      3.25       58.21    5.70       9.26
40.0      26.26     3.35      3.17       60.74    6.06       8.72
35.0      29.40     3.58      3.06       66.27    6.66       8.33
30.0      34.11     3.90      2.92       75.25    7.55       8.04
25.0      40.31     4.33      2.73       88.44    8.84       7.86
20.0      48.38     4.89      2.52      107.63    10.75      7.81
15.0      60.96     5.78      2.35      137.74    13.82      8.01

     The application of these pollutant emission factors to the
     1980 Indianapolis highway assignment resulted in the following
     pollutant emissions:

                   Pollutant Emissions (kilograms)

                         Auto      Truck          Total
Carbon Monoxide          450,539    96,000        546,539
Hydrocarbons              50,765     9,507         60,272
Nitrous Oxides            37,104     9,128         46,232
________________________________________________________________
Total                    538,408   114,635        653,043

                                  2





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.





Click HERE for graphic.




(owp.html)
Jump To Top