
PDF Version 0.99MB
Microsoft
Word Version
Executive
Summary
This document presents the results of the evaluation of the ITS Field
Operational Test (FOT) at Acadia National Park. Through the partnership of the U.S. Departments of Transportation
and Interior, Acadia National Park in the State of Maine was selected for the
FOT to test the effectiveness of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) in
dealing with transportation problems within a National Park setting. ITS has provided effective tools for dealing
with problems of traffic congestion in other settings, and the partners
believed that testing the application of ITS in a National Park was warranted.
The ITS technologies were deployed over a two-year period and in 2002
they were evaluated to determine the impact of ITS on Acadia and the
surrounding communities of Mount Desert Island. The benefits, impacts, and lessons learned that are documented in
this report are directed not only to those associated with the FOT, but also to
others involved with National Parks, gateway communities, and others interested
in the potential for ITS in addressing similar transportation problems.
Background on the ITS Field Operational Test
As part of the National Park System, Acadia has as its dual mission the
preservation of natural and cultural resources and providing visitors with a
meaningful and pleasant experience. The
mission is challenged by the intense usage that Acadia receives during the
summer tourist season owing to its proximity to the population centers of the
Northeast and the attraction of its pristine natural environment and the rugged
beauty of the New England coast. Over
90% of visitors arrive by private vehicle, straining the capacity of the road
system and parking areas within the Park and in the communities of Mount Desert
Island, on which Acadia is located.
To develop an ITS plan to address the transportation problems at Acadia
National Park, a project team was formed that consisted:
·
local
stakeholders—Acadia National Park, Maine Department of Transportation, Friends
of Acadia, Maine Office of Tourism, and other local groups including
representatives of local towns and businesses
·
representatives
of the sponsoring Federal agencies—U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office, FHWA
Division Office, FHWA Federal Lands, and the National Park Service
·
SAIC,
Multisystems, and other contractors to assist in the design and implementation
of ITS.
Together they planned a suite of nine different ITS components to
support the region’s needs for public transportation management, traffic
management, and traveler information. In the area of public transportation, the FOT was able to build on the
success of the Island Explorer, a bus system launched in 1999 to provide free
service during the tourist season throughout much of Mount Desert Island. Five of the nine components in the table
below were used to enhance the operations of the Island Explorer. The remaining four components were to be
used for assisting the Park in management of traffic and to provide real-time
traveler information to visitors.
System
Component
|
Functional
Requirements
|
|
Island Explorer Two-way
Voice Communications
|
Transmit and receive
to/from/between vehicles and dispatch center
|
|
Automatic Vehicle Locator
for Island Explorer
|
Compute and transmit
vehicle location.
Integrate vehicle
locations with departure signs.
Display vehicle locations.
Integrate into annunciator
|
|
Departure Sign for Island
Explorer
|
Transmit location. Compute departure. Transmit to departure signs
|
|
Automated Annunciator for
Island Explorer
|
Determine location. Automatically play next stop and other
pertinent announcements
|
|
Passenger Counter for
Island Explorer
|
Auto-count boardings/
dismounts at selected stops. Store
information.
|
|
Parking Lot Monitoring
|
Record number of vehicles
entering and exiting, provide slow scan video of parking area, transmit data,
display video, store data from vehicle counts
|
|
Automatic Ranger/Vehicle
Geo-Location
|
Determine location +-10
meters, transmit same to server, display locations on map
|
|
Entrance Traffic Volume
Recorder
|
Record and transmit number
of vehicles entering and exiting, store data
|
|
Traveler Information
System
|
Collect and integrate
data, disseminate data to appropriate audience via telephone, Web, and
parking status signs
|
Originally planned to be operational in 2001, technical and
institutional difficulties arose that delayed the deployment for one year. In addition, not all the originally planned
features were operational in 2002, such as the traffic counters as Park
entrances and parking lots. One
component, the automatic ranger/vehicle geo-location system was eliminated
entirely for budgetary reasons.
The Evaluation Process
An independent evaluation of the ITS FOT took place from 2000 through
2003. Under contract to the U.S. DOT,
Battelle Memorial Institute led the evaluation with support from the University
of Maine. Baseline data that reflected
conditions prior to the deployment of the ITS technologies were collected for
the years 1999-2001, and data collected in 2002 measured the post-deployment
impact of the ITS technologies.
A multi-step process was used to identify and prioritize the goals of
the evaluation. Consensus among the
stakeholders identified customer satisfaction and mobility as the top goals for
the evaluation. Maintaining the visitor
experience was critical to both Acadia National Park and to the communities of
Mount Desert Island that rely upon the tourist economy, and thus assessing ITS
from those perspectives was essential. However, importance was placed on assessment of other goal areas as
well, including safety, efficiency, productivity and economic vitality, and
energy and environment. Thus,
evaluation plans were developed and implemented for all six goal areas, with
resources allocated according to the priorities. Hypotheses regarding the anticipated impact of ITS in each goal
area were developed and tested.
A variety of methods were used to collect data for assessing impacts of
ITS. They included a mail survey of 928
visitors to Acadia in the summer of 2002, representing a response rate of
74%. Visitors indicated their
perceptions of transportation problems during their visit, their awareness and
use of the ITS technologies, and the impact ITS had on their travel
experience. A mail survey of 257
businesses (60% response) throughout Mount Desert Island was used to gather
information on business perceptions of the Island Explorer bus system and their
awareness and use and benefits associated with the ITS technologies. Interviews with staff of the Island
Explorer, Acadia National Park, and other stakeholders were used to assess
their experience with ITS from an operational standpoint as well as to assess
their overall deployment experience. Direct observation of visitor parking patterns was conducted in eight
designated parking lots within the Park. Finally, operational data from the Island Explorer and records from
Acadia National Park and various agencies within Maine State Government were
used to assess the impact of ITS.
Results of the Evaluation
Many of the hypothesized impacts of ITS were supported by the evidence
gathered. In other cases, the data were
very limited but suggestive of the anticipated effect. In a few cases the impact was not observed
or was counter to what was anticipated. Some of the key findings in each goal area include:
Customer Satisfaction
- Visitors rated their
overall experience and satisfaction with their visit very high, but travel
experience during their visit was rated lower. Visitors expressed most concern about unsafe conditions
caused by vehicles parked along main roads. Other top concerns were the number of automobiles both
inside and outside the Park and their impact on air quality.
- ITS-users expressed
more concern about travel issues in general than non-ITS users and sought
means to alleviate those concerns via ITS and the Island Explorer. Non-users, on the other hand, were
either less sensitive to travel conditions or had strategies for coping
with problems that didn’t involve the need for Island Explorer or ITS.
- Visitors rated the
ITS-based traveler information sources very highly (86% or more) on
attributes of ease of use, understandability, and accuracy, and reported
that the information helped relieve the stress or uncertainty of
travel. The vast majority of users
(78% or more) believed using the same ITS-based information again in a
future visit would be a pleasant experience. Particularly promising are reports from ITS users that they
would plan to use the information again.
- Drivers and managers of
the Island Explorer bus system expressed a high degree of satisfaction
with the five ITS technologies associated with the buses. Managers believed that ITS improved bus
operations and contributed to customer satisfaction, but they weren’t sure
if ITS directly increased ridership.
Drivers felt that ITS made their jobs easier and helped them to
cope with increasing traffic and ridership.
- Park managers believed
that parking lot status signs and bus departure signs have a positive
influence on congestion and traffic by facilitating bus travel, whereas
Park rangers believed that the Island Explorer with ITS enhancements is
helping to alleviate congestion but were less enthusiastic about the
parking information signs.
Mobility
- Real-time parking
information was made it was easier for visitors to get around and avoid
parking problems and traffic congestion.
The parking information impacted decisions visitors made about
travel in the Park. Of visitors
using the parking information, 43% changed the time they visited a
destination and 38% changed destinations based on the information.
- Visitors strongly
believed in the benefits of the Island Explorer’s real-time bus departure
signs and the on-board bus announcements.
Over 80% found that these ITS technologies made it easier to get
around and 69-80% visitors believed ITS helped to save time. These results were consistent with
previous studies of Island Explorer passengers who voiced strong support
for the bus system even before ITS was implemented.
- Important goals of the
ITS technologies were to enhance visitors’ experience while at the same
time encouraging them to use the Island Explorer bus rather than their
private vehicles. ITS users of the
electronic departure signs and on-board announcements reported that the
technologies helped them decide to use the Island Explorer bus (80% and
67%, respectively). 44% of the
users of the real time parking information said it helped them decide to
use the Island Explorer bus. Thus,
the ITS technologies appear to be contributing to the overall goal of
diverting visitors from personal vehicles to using the Island Explorer
bus.
Productivity and Economic
Vitality
- The majority of
managers of businesses on Mount Desert Island recognize the importance of
tourism and the benefits to their business or community from being
situated near Acadia National Park.
Nevertheless, transportation was one area that drew negative views,
and they were concerned about tourist season parking and congestion as
well as issues of air quality and safety.
- Business managers
clearly believe that the Island Explorer bus system helps to address some
of their concerns about summer travel conditions, and 69% of the
businesses reported that they provide information to visitors about the
bus. They perceive several
benefits from visitors using the bus, such as less worry about driving and
parking along busy roads, relieving the stress of driving, improving air
quality, creating safer conditions, reducing parking problems in the Park
and providing greater access to Park destinations.
- Business managers
didn’t necessarily believe that more customers were patronizing their
businesses because parking was less of a factor or that the Island
Explorer would cause visitors to stay longer. On the other hand, managers of businesses whose customers
and employees did not use the bus believed that businesses that were
closer to a bus stop than their own enjoyed a competitive advantage.
- The majority (61%) of
business managers was not aware of ITS-based travel information sources,
but their awareness was much greater for the technologies associated with
the Island Explorer than the parking information signs and Website. Business managers perceived many
benefits associated with visitors’ use of both the parking information and
the Island Explorer bus technologies.
- Length of stay by
visitors, a measure of economic impact, was positively correlated with use
of the Island Explorer and with use of ITS technologies associated with
the bus. However, there was a
great deal of uncertainty among business managers about whether visitors
who use the Island Explorer tend to stay longer.
- While it was expected
that the Island Explorer operations would benefit from productivity
improvements resulting from ITS technologies, the opposite happened and
operational costs increased from 2001 to 2002 for a variety of
reasons. Despite this overall
increase, the cost per rider and per mile driven did decline.
Efficiency
- While total
recreational visitors to Acadia National Park during the summer season
increased by 1.3% from 2001 to 2002, ridership of the Island Explorer
increased by 17%. Thus, a higher
proportion of Acadia summer recreational visitors used the bus after ITS
was operational than before, growing from 15.6% in 2001 and 18.3% in 2002.
- Fewer vehicles were
parked outside designated parking spaces (excess parking) aftert ITS
technologies were implemented. In
eight lots where parking was monitored, the percentage of days when more
than 300 vehicles were parked outside designated spaces fell from 54% in
2001 to 33% in 2002. Similarly,
the average number of excess parked vehicles per day fell from 325 in 2001
to 274 in 2002 even though total number of visitors to the Park grew.
- The real-time parking
information posted on signs and on the Park’s Website was for two of the
two most utilized parking lots, Sand Beach and Jordan Pond. Average excess parking per day at both
lots fell after ITS was deployed.
- The Island Explorer
operations realized efficiency benefits after ITS implementation. Miles driven decreased slightly (-1.4%)
even though ridership increased significantly (17%).
- Interviews with Island
Explorer staff indicated that voice communications between drivers and the
dispatcher helped communicate information on large passenger loads and
blocked roads. Managers voiced
support for the automatic vehicle locator system for helping them with
route management and monitoring buses for schedule adherence, speed, and
position within the overall system.
Energy and Environment
- Visitors exhibited a
high degree of concern about vehicles negatively impacting air quality on
Mount Desert Island—it ranked among the top five problems related to
travel experience during their trip to Acadia National Park.
- Emissions modeling that
took into account the increase in ridership of the Island Explorer
indicated that air quality benefited from the bus system, with an
estimated additional 1.17 tons of emissions avoided in 2002, the year that
ITS was operational.
- A reduction in excess
parking at Sand Beach and Jordan Pond parking lots suggest that ITS by
moving visitors away from full lots and putting more visitors on buses may
help address aesthetic concerns about the sight of many vehicles parked
along roads detracting from the natural beauty of the Park.
Safety
- Visitors to Acadia
National Park identified safety as their top concern related to travel
during their visit. Seventy
percent of surveyed visitors thought that vehicles parked along the main
roads caused unsafe conditions.
- Motor vehicle accidents
along routes of the Island Explorer within the Park decreased dramatically
(-54%) during the summer months of 2002.
- The voice
communications and automatic vehicle location technologies on the Island
Explorer provided safety benefits to drivers and managers of the bus
system. Drivers were able to
report accidents and other hazardous conditions, and managers were able to
remotely locate buses in emergency situations.
Conclusions and Recommendations
This evaluation of ITS at Acadia National Park and Mount Desert Island
is based on one season of post-deployment experience. It is also based on a deployment that was not yet fully realized,
because not all of the technologies were in place by the summer of 2002. Nevertheless, the results of the evaluation
lead to a number of conclusions about the benefits that ITS provided. Recommendations based on these conclusions
are also presented for further consideration by the FOT stakeholders and by
other National Parks and gateway communities that must deal with similar
transportation problems. Some of the
conclusions and recommendations identified in this report include:
·
ITS
contributed to a positive visitor experience and increased visitors’
willingness to use transit rather than their own vehicles. Greater use of the Island Explorer appeared
to be associated with improvements in air quality and possibly to overall
traffic and motor vehicle crashes.
o The full deployment of the
planned ITS technologies at Acadia should be completed and the system
maintained so that the benefits can continue to be enjoyed.
·
Visitors
who use ITS traveler information tend to be the most concerned about travel
problems during their stay, and ITS helps alleviate the problems they perceive. Conversely, those visitors least concerned
about problems associated with using their own vehicles within the Park are
also the least likely to use the ITS sources of traveler information.
o Marketing messages promoting
tourism at Acadia and Mount Desert Island should find a way to inform visitors
of the travel problems they might encounter and emphasize the Island Explorer
as a solution that is free and easy to use with the ITS enhancements.
·
Real-time
parking information, despite the limited deployment of signs at three locations
and the Park Website, was used by visitors, who reacted to it positively. The information appears to have the desired
effect of reducing excess parking at the two advertised parking lots that are
the most popular destinations in the Park—Sand Beach and Jordan Pond. Although only about 40% of visitors reported
they changed their plans based on real-time parking information, even that
percent could help lessen the demand for parking. Indeed, the statistics on excess parking in the Park’s lots
suggest that ITS helped to lower demand for parking within the Park through a
combination of real-time information on parking status provided to visitors and
making visitors aware that the Island Explorer is an attractive option for
reaching desired destinations.
o
Consideration
should be given to adding real-time information on parking lot status at other
destinations within the Park. Expansion
of information on parking conditions can be justified from the standpoint of
customer satisfaction and better management of the Park’s transportation
resources.
o An explicit recommendation
to “take the bus” on signs displaying information on parking status would give
clear guidance to visitors about their options for travel at the point of decision.
·
Based
upon the findings about the perceived benefits of ITS to users, the implication
is that traveler information could be potentially useful to the customers of
many businesses whose managers are currently unaware of the ITS technologies
and traveler information.
o Mechanisms are needed to
help raise awareness among business managers and their employees so that they
promote these types of traveler information sources to their customers.
·
Although
no clear case can be made that visitors are attracted to Acadia and Mount
Desert Island because of the Island Explorer, use of the Island Explorer is
associated with the most economically attractive types of visitors because they
stay longer and spend more. Since
visitors reported that the ITS technologies played a role in their decision to
use the bus and enhanced their experience with the bus, ITS would appear to be
useful from an economic development standpoint.
o Businesses of Mount Desert
Island should be further educated about the potential impact of ITS on the
local economy and should encourage use of the Island Explorer and traveler
information in promotion of Mount Desert Island tourism more than they
currently do.
Table of
Contents
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. ii
1.0...... INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1...... Acadia National Park: The
Setting......................................................................... 1-1
1.2...... Transportation Problems at Acadia National Park................................................... 1-2
1.3...... ITS as a Potential Solution to Transportation Problems at National
Parks................ 1-3
2.0...... ITS FIELD OPERATIONAL TEST
DEPLOYMENT OVERVIEW.......................... 2-1
2.1...... Deployment Experience......................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 EVALUATION APPROACH......................................................................................... 3-1
3.1...... Methodologies Used for Data Collection................................................................ 3-2
3.2...... Expected Impacts of ITS....................................................................................... 3-4
4.0 CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION..................................................................................... 4-1
4.1...... Role of ITS in the Visitor Experience...................................................................... 4-3
4.2...... Awareness and Use of Traveler Information........................................................... 4-3
4.3...... Customer Satisfaction Among ITS Users.............................................................. 4-10
4.4...... Customer Satisfaction Among Members of the FOT Team................................... 4-17
4.5...... Summary of Customer Satisfaction....................................................................... 4-21
5.0 MOBILITY..................................................................................................................... 5-1
5.1...... Avoiding Problems................................................................................................. 5-1
5.2...... Ease of Movement................................................................................................. 5-3
5.3...... Saving Time........................................................................................................... 5-5
5.4...... Changing Departure Time or Destination................................................................. 5-7
5.5...... Summary of Mobility.............................................................................................. 5-9
6.0 PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMIC
VITALITY....................................................... 6-1
6.1...... The Role of Tourism in the Local Economy............................................................. 6-1
6.2...... Business Managers’ View of Transportation Problems and ITS Solutions................ 6-4
6.2.1... Business Managers’ Attitudes Toward the Island Explorer.......................... 6-6
6.2.2... Awareness and Usage of ITS Technologies................................................ 6-8
6.2.3... Business Managers’ Perception of Benefits of ITS Technologies............... 6-10
6.3...... Assessing Economic Impact with the Visitors’ Survey........................................... 6-11
6.4...... Economic Impact of ITS on Acadia National Park................................................ 6-15
6.5...... Impact of ITS on Productivity of Island Explorer Operations................................. 6-16
6.6...... Summary of Productivity and Economic Vitality.................................................... 6-19
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
7.0 EFFICIENCY.................................................................................................................. 7-1
7.1...... Impact of ITS on Efficiency of Acadia National Park Operations............................ 7-1
7.2...... Effect of ITS on Visitors’ Parking Lot Usage.......................................................... 7-2
7.3...... Impact of ITS on Efficiency of Island Explorer Operations...................................... 7-5
7.4...... Summary of Efficiency............................................................................................ 7-7
8.0 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT......................................................... 8-1
8.1...... Air Quality Impacts................................................................................................ 8-1
8.2...... Impact of Vehicles on Park Aesthetics.................... 8-Error!
Bookmark not defined.
8.3...... Summary of Energy and Environment..................................................................... 8-3
9.0 SAFETY........................................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1...... Visitors’ Traffic Safety Concerns............................................................................ 9-1
9.2...... Trends in Traffic Safety on Mount Desert Island..................................................... 9-1
9.3...... ITS Contribution to Safety in Transportation Management...................................... 9-2
9.4...... Summary of Safety................................................................................................. 9-2
10.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................... 10-1
10.1.... Key Findings....................................................................................................... 10-1
10.2.... Conclusions and Recommendations...................................................................... 10-4
List of Tables
Table 2-1:.... ITS System
Components.......................................................................................... 2-3
Table 3-1:.... Evaluation
Tests and Goal Areas to Which They Applied........................................... 3-2
Table 3-2:.... Expected ITS
Impacts by Six Goal Areas.................................................................. 3-4
Table 4-1:.... Percent of
Respondents Who Were Aware of and Used Travel Information Sources? 4-4
Table 4-2:.... Visitor
Ratings of Problems Related to Travel on Mount Desert Island and in Acadia
National Park 4-6
Table 4-3:.... Visitor
Ratings of Travel Experiences Using a Personal Vehicle.................................. 4-9
Table 4-4:.... Average
Ratings of Satisfaction with ITS Components by
Island Explorer Staff............................................................................................... 4-18
Table 4-5:.... Average
Ratings of Satisfaction with the ITS Components by
Acadia National Park Staff...................................................................................... 4-20
Table 4-6:.... Objectives
and Hypotheses Related to Customer Satisfaction.................................. 4-21
Table 5-1:.... Visitor
Activities Inside Acadia National Park and Outside the Park........................... 5-9
Table 5-2:.... Objectives
and Hypotheses Related to Mobility......................................................... 5-9
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
Table 6-1:.... Business
Managers’ Views of Potential Benefits and Negative Impacts Related to Tourism
in the Community................................................................................................................................ 6-2
Table 6-2:.... Business
Managers’ Attitudes about Acadia National Park’s Contributions................ 6-3
Table 6-3:.... Business
Managers’ Perceptions of Travel Issues
and Magnitude of Problem on Mount Desert Island and in Acadia National Park
this Summer............................................................................ 6-5
Table 6-4:.... Business
Managers’ Ratings of the Benefits of the Island Explorer Bus....................... 6-7
Table 6-5:.... Business
Managers’ Awareness and Use of the Travel Information Sources
this Summer.............................................................................................................. 6-9
Table 6-6:.... Business
Managers’ Ratings of the Benefits of Providing Information on
Parking Conditions Within the Park......................................................................... 6-10
Table 6-7:.... Business
Managers’ Ratings of the Benefits of Island Explorer
Traveler Information................................................................................................ 6-11
Table 6-8:.... Days Spent
Visiting Mount Desert Island Area by ITS User and
ITS Non-User........................................................................................................ 6-12
Table 6-9:.... Money Spent
During Visit by ITS User and ITS Non-User...................................... 6-13
Table 6-10:.. Mode of
Transportation Used to Reach Mount Desert Island................................... 6-14
Table 6-11:.. Island
Explorer Operational Measures..................................................................... 6-17
Table 6-12:.. Objectives
and Hypotheses Related to Productivity and Economic Vitality............... 6-19
Table 7-1:.... Percent of
Days in Which Vehicles Exceeded the Capacity of Eight
Designated Parking Lots in Acadia National Park...................................................... 7-2
Table 7-2:.... Mean Number
of Vehicles that Exceeded the Capacity and Time of Day for
Parking Lots at Sand Beach and Jordan Pond........................................................... 7-4
Table 7-3:.... Mean Number
of Vehicles Exceeding the Capacity of Individual Lots in
Acadia National Park................................................................................................ 7-4
Table 7-4:.... Island
Explorer Operational Statistics........................................................................ 7-6
Table 7-5:.... Objectives
and Hypotheses Related to Efficiency....................................................... 7-8
Table 8-1:.... Objectives
and Hypotheses Related to Energy and Environment................................. 8-3
Table 9-1:.... Objectives
and Hypotheses Related to Safety............................................................ 9-3
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
List of Figures
Figure 1-1:...... Map of
Coastline of Maine Showing Acadia National Park..................................... 1-2
Figure 2-1:...... System
Architecture for ITS FOT at Acadia National Park..................................... 2-3
Figure 4-1:...... Proportion
of Survey Respondents by Residence.................................................... 4-1
Figure 4-2:...... Parking
Lot Information Sign at Visitor Center........................................................ 4-3
Figure 4-3:...... Parking
Lot Information Sign at Seawall Campground............................................. 4-3
Figure 4-4:...... Parking
Lot Information on the Acadia National Park Website................................ 4-4
Figure 4-5:...... Automatic
Annunciator Text Display On-board the Island Explorer Bus.................. 4-4
Figure 4-6:...... Electronic
Bus Departure Sign at Village Green....................................................... 4-4
Figure 4-7:...... Electronic
Bus Departure Sign at Visitor Center...................................................... 4-4
Figure 4-8:...... Respondents’
Agreement with Features of Parking Information Signs.................... 4-10
Figure 4-9:...... Respondents
Agreement That Parking Conditions Information Helped to
Reduce Tension and Stress Related to Traveling................................................... 4-11
Figure 4-10:.... Respondents’
Agreement with Features of Real-time Bus Departure Signs............ 4-12
Figure 4-11:.... Respondents
Agreement That Real Time Bus Departure Sign Relieved Uncertainty When the Bus
Would Arrive.................................................................................................................. 4-13
Figure 4-12:.... Respondents’
Agreement with Text Features of Automated On-Board Announcements 4-13
Figure 4-13:.... Respondents’
Agreement with Audio Features of Automated On-Board Announcements 4-13
Figure 4-14:.... Respondents’
Agreement that Bus On-Board Announcements Helped to
Relieve Uncertainty About When the Bus Would Arrive at my Stop...................... 4-15
Figure 4-15:.... Respondents
Agreement that Bus On-Board Announcements Helped to
Relieve Uncertainty About When to Exit the Bus................................................... 4-15
Figure 4-16:.... Respondents
Agreement That Parking Information Helped Me Decide to
Use the Island Explorer Bus................................................................................. 4-16
Figure 4-17:.... Respondents’
Agreement That Real Time Bus Departure Signs Helped
Me Decide to Use the Island Explorer Bus........................................................... 4-16
Figure 4-18:.... Respondents’
Agreement That Bus On-Board Announcements Helped
Me Decide to Use the Island Explorer Bus........................................................... 4-17
Figure 4-19:.... ITS
Equipment Inside Island Explorer Bus: Voice and Text
Communications and Passenger Counter.............................................................. 4-18
Figure 4-20:.... Island
Explorer Dispatcher’s Office with Radio Voice Communications
and Bus Management Software............................................................................ 4-18
Figure 4-21:.... Bus
Tracking Software Connected to Automatic Vehicle Locator on Buses........... 4-18